Top Syria regime-change hustlers and media “experts,” from Bellingcat to pro-war journalists, helped transform the @ShamiWitness account from a foreign Salafi-jihadist recruiter into a credible “ISIS expert.”
By Mark Ames
Who remembers Shami Witness? At the peak of ISIS’s power, @ShamiWitness stood out as the genocidal militia’s “most influential Twitter account,” according to a Channel 4 exposé and a Kings College report.
The @ShamiWitness account was followed by some two-thirds of foreign jihadis. But it went further than propagandizing Islamic State’s massacres and rapes: Shami Witness also actively recruited foreign jihadis and helped lead them through the ratlines in Turkey, into the ISIS killing fields in Syria and Iraq, as a George Washington University report revealed this year.
But I want to talk about the western “experts” in Washington and London who cozied up to Shami Witness — especially since all of them are still around, many of them bigger and more influential in our political discourse than ever. They’re the ones who built up Shami Witness’s social media capital, making his account so popular, and so effective, in recruiting ISIS murderers.
They validated and lent credibility to Shami Witness as someone with deep, local insider knowledge, boosting Shami Witness’s social capital their countless retweets, #FF’s, #Pt’s, and their numerous public interactions.
As it turned out, Shami Witness was a fake “Syria expert”. The millennial yuppie who ran the @ShamiWitness account was as much an insider expert on ISIS as the western Syria hacks who boosted him.
It wasn’t the “experts” like Bellingcat who unmasked Shami Witness — quite the opposite, Bellingcat’s team played a major role in building him up as a credible expert. Rather, it was a Channel 4 report exposing Shami Witness as a fake — but a very dark and dangerous fake, with very real world consequences.
@ShamiWitness was run by a 24-year-old Indian marketing executive named Mehdi Masroor Biswas, who tweeted out ISIS and Syria “expertise” from his bachelor pad in Bangalore, India.
And just like that, the London and Washington Syria regime-change neocons who’d been boosting Shami Witness suddenly looked like fools — as well as ISIS accessories. Contrary to what they had all assumed, Shami Witness wasn’t the expert Syria insider he pretended to be. He spoke no Arabic; he was nowhere near Syria.
The @ShamiWitness account was every bit as sick, sectarian, and vile as you’d expect from ISIS’s leading Twitter account. In its brief gory heyday, ISIS was responsible for slaughtering somewhere between 50,000 and 100,000 people in Iraq and Syria; enslaving, raping and exterminating untold thousands of Yezidis and other minorities in the region.
Which makes it all the more shocking how these western experts, most of whose careers are still thriving today, bigger than ever in fact, were able to get away with being accessories to ISIS propaganda and recruiting efforts.
It wasn’t as though they couldn’t have known Shami Witness was a monster. A year before Shami Witness was unmasked, Michael Kelley called out reporters (including himself) for being accessories to Shami Witness’s social media influence, but he was practically alone in that.
Here are a few gruesome examples of Shami Witness’s Twitter account in action:
In 2014, responding to reports out of Kobane that ISIS attackers were raping and mutilating female Kurdish soldiers, Shami Witness gleefully tweeted:
As his Islamic State heroes were posting selfies of their beheaded Kurdish female trophies [WARNING GRAPHIC], Shami Witness tweeted out sick ISIS jokes about murdered Kurds like this:
Shami Witness swooned over ISIS’s murder porn, relentlessly promoting and tweeting out ISIS execution and beheading videos on Twitter.
Shami Witness repeatedly tweeted out ISIS videos of American hostage Peter Kassig’s beheading execution within minutes after they were first posted, feeding bloodlust to his thousands of foreign Salafi-jihadist followers.
And he did his best to inflame sectarian anti-Shia hatreds, gearing up ISIS foreign recruits for the killing fields:
Despite thousands of vile tweets like that, Shami Witness was a popular figure among the Syria regime-change “expert” crowd.
Bellingcat founder Eliot Higgins
One of those experts who has been in the news a lot lately is Eliot Higgins of the Atlantic Council/Bellingcat cyber-sleuth group. Bellingcat have made themselves darlings of the western press — and western intelligence agencies — with their investigative reports targeting NATO’s adversaries, primarily Russia and Syria.
After making headlines for tying Russia to the downing of Malaysian Air Flight 17 and unmasking the alleged GRU poisoners in Salisbury, Higgins and his crew received unanimous glowing press in the BBC, New York Times, Washington Post and elsewhere.
Here is Higgins recommending the ISIS propagandist to his followers:
For the mercifully uninitiated, “#FF” is how you recommend other accounts to your own followers to follow. #FF is a key part of any brand-building strategy. You #FF someone who you think will make you look good, and who you hope will #FF you back to their followers. This is how ambitious Twitter propagandists build brand following:
Here’s the Bellingcat founder promoting some ISIS slaughter porn tweeted out by Shami Witness—in this case, an ISIS video gloating over murdered Kurdish women:
Here is the Bellingcat sleuth engaging in what passes for witty Twitter repartee with Shami Witness, joking about devastating ISIS suicide bomber vehicles that have killed and mutilated untold thousands in Syria and Iraq. But for Bellingcat and Shami Witness, there’s a Gallagher joke in it:
And here’s Higgins offering helpful Twitter tips to ISIS’s top recruiter on how to deal with ISIS’s online critics:
Higgins began his “open source intelligence” career under a misleading avatar — “BrownMoses” — as if Higgins, a doughy pinkish Midlands gamer, was some kind of swarthy Middle Easterner whose friends’ and relatives’ lives were at stake.
Oddly reminiscent of a Mehdi Masroor Biswas pretending to be a Shami Witness (Shami meaning “Syria”). How could ace sleuths Bellingcat not know that Shami Witness was a fraud, let alone a propagandist for mass murder and enslavement?
As online open source experts, they should’ve had no problem unmasking Shami Witness. Slate reported how it was “fairly easy to doxx” Shami Witness after all, based on his giant dumb social media footprints under his real name and real life in Bangalore, accounts which were carelessly linked to his Shami Witness accounts.
Nevertheless, Higgins and his Bellingcat boys were gobsmacked when the ISIS “expert” they’d been #FFing and conversing with for two years turned out to be a fake.
And when Shami Witness was unmasked, rather than owning up to it and trying to understand how he’d been duped, Higgins tried to turn it all into a fatuous joke, in a strangely transparent attempt to minimize the whole scandal and make it go away:
Higgins’ efforts to downplay Shami Witness were deliberately misleading as well as childish. He was trying to cover his own ass over having been duped by a Bangalore dweeb with blood on his hands.
We now know from detailed terrorism studies that Shami Witness was not on “toilet cleaning duty” as Higgins quipped. He very literally led foreign jihadi recruits into the Syrian and Iraqi killing fields, and inspired one of ISIS’s most gruesome foreign terrorist attacks, in Dhaka.
Ex-VICE producer Danny Gold
You had to try really hard not to know what you were getting involved in with Shami Witness, and in case you were trying too hard, Shami Witness boasted what he was up to, such as this tweet to another chummy Washington regime-change operative and former founding producer and host for VICE, Danny Gold:
Mere boasts about ISIS terrorism did not cause Gold any hesitation in brand-building with Shami Witness:
Gulf-funded ‘expert’ Charles Lister
For now, let’s move on to more familiar names in the DC-London regime-change swamp.
Here is ubiquitous regime-change hack Charles Lister, of the Saudi-financedMiddle East Institute, logrolling with Higgins and Shami Witness like something out of a “how to build your social media brand” workshop:
Here’s a string of Lister-Shami Witness-Bellingcat logrolling episodes:
See, this is how you cross-build a community of “experts” on social media: tagging and referencing your circle enough times to create an impression of something happening, a self-validated “community of Syria experts.”
All of them benefited from it, including Shami Witness. Only the Syrian and Iraqi people suffered.
But “Jihad Lister” (as Special Forces veteran Jack Murphy calls him) went further than logrolling with Shami Witness, blowing kisses to the ISIS propagandist/recruiter in ways that are downright sickening:
Here, for example, is Lister yukking it up with Shami Witness over a particularly brutal Saudi-led militia group, Suqur al-Izz, an ally of both ISIS and al-Qaeda’s Syria affiliate Jabhat al-Nusra — and which carried out savage massacres of hundreds of minority Alawite civilians in Latakia province (documented in a Human Rights Watch report). To Lister and his ISIS friend, it’s all good for an ironic laugh:
To which Shami Witness reminded Lister:
Prompting a “right back atcha” from his chum Lister:
Neocon Michael Weiss
Naturally, this sordid ISIS-neocon Twitter orgy features serial Thesaurus-abuser Michael Weiss, the Daily Beast’s tenured regime-change hack. There’s a lot of love going back and forth between the two. Perhaps most astonishing is Shami Witness declaring Michael Weiss as his favorite journalist, Weiss going wobbly at the knees in gratitude, and the ISIS recruiter blowing him a smiley:
Incredible as it may seem, around the time of this Shami Witness love-fest, this same group — Weiss, Zelin, and Bellingcat — soon ganged up on another and far better Syria analyst, Aymenn Al Tamimi, accusing him of — are you ready? — being too friendly on Twitter with ISIS.
The think-tank neocons accused Tamimi of having turned into a terrorist. In fact, Tamimi’s real sin was debunking an inane Michael Weiss conspiracy article that claimed Iran and ISIS were “secret allies” in Syria.
Weiss gets things wrongs as a rule, because being wrong is his career. It’s a job not many people are willing to do, or capable of doing without triggering a gag reflex. Michael Weiss gargles made-to-order shit without so much as a chaser. He is, quite literally, a tenured failure.
There’s a lot of dark demand for this kind of work, and very few willing takers. You need to believe you’re some kind of evil genius, pulling a fast one on all the honest rubes, to get off on this kind of work.
Weiss also struck up all sorts of sleazy relationships with Syrian jihadis, and even posed for selfies in a jihadi-controlled section of Aleppo in 2012:
And the other guy with the AK, the one who looks like Harold Ramis, is Mahmoud Sheikh al-Zour, who ran his own rebel training camp in northern Syria, and worked in Al Qaeda-dominated Idlib as well as Aleppo.
So you’d think Weiss and his crew would be a little more circumspect about accusing a far more serious Syria analyst like Aymenn Jawad al-Tamimi of being a jihadist sympathizer — but hypocrisy never bothered a neocon.
And anyway, their gang hit on Tamimi’s reputation had nothing to do with Salafi-jihadist sympathies, and everything to do with making Weiss look bad. So the syndicate took a break from brand-building with Shami Witness, to try to sink Tamimi’s career by smearing him as a terrorist symp.
Rosen’s article begins with the goal reported as fact:
Aymenn Al Tamimi’s career came apart in public last week.
A couple paragraphs down, the article explains how:
almost from the beginning, his links to known jihadis — including members of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), arguably the most ruthless of such groups — and a habit of firing off tweets and social media posts appearing to sympathize with their cause raised eyebrows among his colleagues in the tightly knit, scholarly community of Western-based terrorism analysts.
Next paragraph comes the bombshell evidence, in the form of a non sequitur:
On July 14, Al Tamimi, who had been cited in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post and had appeared on BBC News, published an article attempting to debunk journalist Michael Weiss’s evidence that Iran was aiding ISIS, which now controls a roughly Belgium-sized slice of Iraq and Syria.
This is where the “tightly knit” syndicate comes in. It’s not about evidence or expository logic; the evidence is what the self-appointed “community” decides is evidence. In this instance, it was Bellingcat that pulled the pulled open the trap door:
[Tamimi’s] article was cross-posted to Bellingcat, the online publication launched by Eliot Higgins, the renowned investigative journalist most famous for helping to prove the Syrian regime’s responsibility for the August 21, 2013, chemical weapons attack in Damascus.
But within days the article had been pulled from Bellingcat and Tamimi had been dropped as a contributor to the site, a development Higgins confirmed for Business Insider by email early last week.
Higgins cited serious accusations that had surfaced on Twitter after fellow terrorism analysts had aired evidence suggesting that Tamimi was discomfortingly close with some of his sources in the jihadist world.
Weiss linked to a conversation in which Tamimi told an apparent ISIS supporter that it was “best not openly tweeting” pro-Caliphate sympathies, and that his “bro,” the pro-ISIS Twitter user Shami Witness, “suggested I should stick to objectivity on Twitter.”
Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, a senior fellow at the the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, called the exchange “pretty disturbing.”
That would be this Daveed Gartenstein-Ross:
This is a classic neocon smear strategy: Activate the network to create the impression that the character smear is a consensus opinion by experts from different backgrounds, and drive the stake in the heart with a retraction. In this case, Bellingcat’s Eliot Higgins played executioner in the Tamimi smear.
Eliot Higgins and his Bellingcat crew have come a long way since this smear on Tamimi. These days, Bellingcat are media celebrities, fronting for western intelligence agencies’ information wars against Russia and Syria.
Higgins and Bellingcat have positioned themselves as a pro-NATO Wikileaks, exposing the lies and crimes of NATO’s adversaries, racking up lucrative grants from Google, the Atlantic Council, and Bill Casey’s old regime-change front the National Endowment for Democracy along the way.
To Tamimi’s credit, he was one of the very few Syria analysts or journalists who publicly owned up to his own role in lending credibility to Shami Witness’s Twitter account. Unlike Weiss, Zelin, Lister, Higgins, or any of the other Bellingcats, who never owned up to their own role as accessories to Shami Witness, Tamimi had the integrity to write about and explore his own mistakes, and to try to learn from those mistakes.
And despite Bellingcat’s best efforts, Tamimi is still around, blogging at Syria Comment — a site edited by one of the very few American Syria experts to actually get the Syria war right — Professor Joshua Landis, who heads the Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Oklahoma, and who appeared on Radio War Nerd early this year.
Being right about Syria is, as I’ve said, the only sin in this business. So you might not be surprised to learn that Michael Weiss and Shami Witness teamed up against Landis.
Actually it’s worse: Weiss and Shami Witness ganged up on Landis by making menacing attacks on Landis’s Syrian-born wife and her family, who are members of Syria’s minority Alawite sect, which has been targeted for extermination by groups supported by ShamiWitness, Weiss, and the rest of this DC-London regime-change crowd.
Here is the Shami-Weiss-Landis exchange, in which Weiss tags his ISIS pal to attack Professor Landis’s in-laws, many of whom still live in Syria:
After Weiss tagged in ISIS’s top propagandist to attack Landis’s Alawite wife and in-laws, he reached for his trusty Thesaurus to deliver what passes for a witty coup de grace, in what passes for the pen of Michael Weiss:
More Syria ‘experts’ who boosted ISIS recruiter Shami Witness
We have spent enough time on these sleazy goons. Let’s name some more western “experts” who boosted and promoted the @ShamiWitness account:
Phillip Smyth of AIPAC spinoff the Washington Institute for Near East Studies:
Faysal Itani, senior fellow at the Saudi-funded Atlantic Council:
“[H]e remains a noticeable voice in the Syria discussion. That is uncomfortable for analysts and reporters (including this author) who have directly or indirectly facilitated Shami’s rise, even if the lift merely involved a citation, a retweet, or friendly banter.”
After Shami Witness was exposed in December 2014, Syria journalists and experts who hadn’t been part of the Shami Witness Dupe Brigade called out the hacks who’d made Shami Witness a powerful and influential propagandist.
In the months and years since the @ShamiWitness account was unmasked and the young man behind it arrested, we’ve learned that Shami Witness was more than just ISIS’s most influential propagandist on Twitter.
Two of the ISIS Bangladeshi jihadis who carried out the gruesome 2016 Dhaka attack were avid followers of Shami Witness. That attack left 29 dead — including nine Italians, five women, and four men, all of whose bodies showed signs of gruesome torture, punishment for anyone who couldn’t cite verses from the Koran.
Indian authorities also discovered that Shami Witness helped recruit Areef Majid and his group of ISIS jihadist recruits from Kalyan, near Mumbai. Majid fought for ISIS in Iraq and Syria, before escaping in late 2014 — like a lot of foreign recruits who started getting cold feet after the US-led coalition and Kurdish fighters made life harder for the Islamic State’s army of sadists and genocidaires.
And this year, a report by the George Washington University Program on Extremism, titled “The Travelers. American Jihadists in Syria and Iraq” revealed just how intimately involved Shami Witness was in ISIS recruiting and logistics, guiding foreign Salafi-jihadists to the ISIS rape camps and killing fields in Syria and Iraq.
The report goes deep into the experience of an American ISIS recruit, “Mo,” who was “one of the first Americans to go to Syria [to fight for ISIS].”
In June 2014, the FBI paid a visit to Mo after monitoring his online interactions with the likes of Shami Witness. Shortly afterwards, Mo bought a one-way ticket to Istanbul, and made his way to a Turkish town called Urfa (or “Şanlıurfa” in Turkish).
From accounts like Shami Witness, Mo understood that to join ISIS, Urfa “was the place to go.”
Here, the George Washington U report describes how Shami Witness led “Mo” to his ISIS handlers:
“While analysis of @Shamiwitness’ activities to date paint him merely as a propaganda disseminator for IS, it seems that his role may have in fact also been one of direct facilitation for would-be Western travelers. While in Şanlıurfa, Mo used Twitter to reach out to @Shamiwitness, who put him in touch with three local IS facilitators, including a British IS member called Abu Rahman al-Britani. Using Kik, the encrypted messenger of choice for IS travelers at the time, he reached out to al-Britani. Mo was then given a number for an IS smuggler and told by al-Britani that he could use him for tazkiya, a vetting process whereby a known fighter vouches for a new member to other IS members.”
So people in Syria and Iraq were killed, kidnapped, tortured and raped. And Shami Witness is rotting in an Indian prison somewhere.
But that’s not their problem. Eliot Higgins, Michael Weiss, and company have moved on to bigger things now. Their power network is a lot bigger too. And they can prove beyond a doubt that if you question their research, you might be working for the enemy. Why else would anyone question their expertise?